Business combinations under common control

Authors
Table of Contents

IFRS 3 Business Combinations applies only to transactions which take place between unrelated parties. Therefore, the requirements of IFRS 3 do not apply in accounting for business combinations that include entities which are under common control.

Common control

A business combination of entities under common control is such where all of the combining entities are ultimately controlled by the same party before and after the transaction, and where control is not transitory. The party holding control could be the ultimate parent entity, an individual or group of individuals. In determining whether entities are under common control, the existence of non-controlling interest and whether the combining entity has been consolidated before, are not relevant, as the subsidiary is nevertheless under the control of the parent.

Where group of individuals are regarded as having control, this should be evidenced by a contractual arrangement, either in the form of a written or unwritten agreement.

Illustrative example – Business combination under common control

Company A has two 100% subsidiaries – Company X and Company Y. Company A sells its subsidiary – Company X to another of its subsidiary – Company Y. Company A ultimately controls both Company X and Company Y before and after the business combination.

Structure of the group before and after the transaction is as follows:

Before

Company structure before the transaction

After

Company structure after the transaction

Accounting for business combinations under common control

Under IFRS, there are two acceptable approaches for accounting for business combination taking place under common control. These are:

  • The acquisition method as per IFRS 3, and
  • The pooling of interests method (book-value method under the US GAAP)

Acquisition method

Although the company has an option to select the acquisition method as an accounting policy to account for the business combinations under common control, it could only be selected if the transaction has substance for the combining entities.

Careful consideration should be given when assessing whether the business combination under common control has substance. Factors to be evaluated involve, but are not limited to the below:

  • The purpose of the business combination under common control
  • The involvement of third parties in the business combination, e.g. non-controlling interests or others
  • Is the transaction conducted at fair value
  • The current activities of the entities involved in the business combination under common control
  • Whether the entities are brought together into a reporting entity that did not exist before

Therefore, accounting policy choice is actually only available if the business combination has substance.

The acquisition method as ruled by IFRS 3, is considered applicable where the business combination takes place on arm’s length basis. i.e. the consideration transferred is generally measured at acquisition date fair value of net assets and the fair value of the consideration reflects the value of acquired entity. Business combinations effected under common control, however, might not be conducted on arm’s length basis and the fair value of consideration transferred might not represent the value of the entity obtained. If the business combination under common control does not take place at arm’s length, but assuming it has substance, then the receiving entity has an accounting policy choice to either:

  • Recognise the business combination under common control at the consideration transferred as it is agreed between the buyer and seller (measured at the acquisition–date fair value in accordance with IFRS 3), or
  • Recognise the business combination under common control at the fair value of the acquired business
    • the difference arising between the fair value of the consideration transferred and the fair value of the acquired business is then recognised as a contribution to or distribution from equity

Illustrative example – Application of acquisition method

Company A has two 100% subsidiaries – Company X and Company Y. Company A sells Company X to Company Y for 2000 KEUR cash, which also reflects the fair value of Company X. At the date of acquisition the carrying amount of net assets of Company X amounted to 800 KEUR (both in the individual financial statements of Company X and consolidated statements of Company A) and the net of fair values of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed amounts to 1700 KEUR.

Company A ultimately controls both Company X and Company Y before and after the business combination.

The transaction has substance, Company Y is identified as the acquirer and it elects to accounting for the business combination at acquisition method.

  1. If the business combination under common control is at arm’s length, then:
    • Goodwill arising from the business combination and recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position of Company Y amounts to 300 MEUR:

      KEUR
      Consideration transferred2 000
      Net of fair values of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed1 700
      Goodwill300
    • Net identifiable assets of Company X will be initially reflected at their acquisition–date fair values in the consolidated statement of financial position of Company Y

    • In the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, only the post-acquisition results of Company X will be reflected.

  2. Business combination under common control is not at arm’s length. Consideration transferred amounts to 1800 KEUR. All other facts from above remain.
    • Option 1:
      • Company Y recognises the transaction at the consideration transferred as agreed between Company A and Company Y, i.e. at 1800 KEUR.
      • Goodwill arising from the transaction amounts to 1800 – 1700 = 100 KEUR.
    • Option 2:
      • Company Y recognises the transaction at the fair value of Company X, being 2000 KEUR.
      • The excess over the fair value of the transferred entity and the acquisition–date fair value of the consideration transferred, i.e. 2000 – 1800 = 200 KEUR, is recognised in the equity of Company Y as a capital contribution from Company A.
      • Goodwill arising from the transaction amounts to 2000 – 1700 = 300 KEUR.

If the business combination does not have substance, then the only acceptable method for accounting for the business combination under common control is the pooling of interests method.

Pooling of interests method

The pooling of interests method is generally considered to involve the following:

  • The assets and liabilities of the combining entities are reflected at their carrying amounts.
    • No adjustments are made to reflect fair values, or recognise any new assets or liabilities, at the date of the business combination under common control, which would be done under the acquisition method. The only adjustments necessary are to align accounting policies.
  • No “new” goodwill is recognised as a result of the business combination under common control.
    • The only goodwill that is recognised is any existing goodwill which relates to either of the combining entities. The difference between the consideration transferred and the net assets acquired is reflected within equity.
  • The income statement reflects the results of the combining entities.

In applying the pooling of interest method, few practical issues arise.

Which carrying amounts to use?

The carrying amounts of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed could be derived from at least two sources:

  • Amounts recognised in the individual financial statements of the entity transferred
  • Amounts recognised by the controlling entity in the consolidated financial statements.

The above two sets of carrying amounts could differ from one another, for example, due to different accounting policies applied in the individual financial statements and by the group. Also, differences in carrying amounts could result from the fair value adjustments and goodwill arising from the past acquisition of the transferred entity by that controlling party.

Generally, the receiving entity, when applying the pooling of interests method, would use the carrying amounts of the transferred entity as were recognised by the controlling entity, however using the amounts recognised by the acquiree could be acceptable in certain circumstances.

In considering which set of carrying amounts to use, the receiving entity should consider the following factors:

  • The timing of the business combination under common control – close to the initial acquisition by the controlling party vs acquisition that took place a long time ago
  • Whether the transaction is carried out in the preparation for external sale – similar to previous point
  • The identity and nature of the users of the financial statements – existence of significant non-controlling interests and/or creditors
  • Whether consistent accounting policies have been used for similar and related transactions.

The carrying amounts of the receiving entity’s assets and liabilities remain the same as those in its existing financial statements prior to the business combination under common control.

Should the financial information of periods prior to business combination under common control be restated?

The receiving entity has an accounting policy choice either to:

  • Restate the financial information in the consolidated financial statements for periods prior to the business combination under common control, to reflect that the transaction had occurred from the beginning of the earliest period presented, ignoring the actual transaction date but limited to the prior periods of only those where the combining entities were under the same controlling party, or
  • Account for the business combination under common control prospectively from the date on which it occurred, and thus the financial information of prior periods is not restated in the consolidated financial statements.

What to do with equity reserves and the history of assets and liabilities of the transferred entity?

If the receiving entity in a business combination under common control elects to restate the prior period information, pooling is applied in full and the history of the combining entities (since they were under common control of the same controlling party) is continued.

If the receiving entity in a business combination under common control elects not to restate the prior period information, it has further choice to:

  • Retain the equity reserves and history of assets and liabilities - the financial information for periods prior to the business combination is not restated, but the pre–combination equity reserves and history of assets and liabilities of the entity transferred are carried over as at the date of transaction and are reflected in the post–combination financial statements of the receiving entity.
  • Reset of equity balances and history of assets and liabilities - the financial information for prior periods is not restated, the transaction results in an initial recognition of the assets and liabilities of the entity transferred at their predecessor carrying amounts and the equity balances of the entity transferred are not carried over but adjusted to another component of equity (e.g., retained earnings). Thus, the post–combination financial statements of the receiving entity do not reflect any pre–combination history of the entity transferred.

Net assets position of the above choices at the date of business combination under common control is the same, whereas the composition of equity would differ.

How to recognise the acquisition of non–controlling interest as part of a business combination under common control?

Where the reorganisation of the group takes place so that a non–controlling interest in the entity transferred is acquired simultaneously with a business combination under common control, there are two separate transactions to be accounted for:

  • The reorganisation of entities under common control
  • The acquisition of the non-controlling interest

It is not appropriate to reflect the acquisition of non–controlling interest as if it occurred prior to the acquisition even if the acquisition occurs simultaneously with a common control transaction. Thus, the receiving entity accounts for the acquisition of non–controlling interest at the actual date of acquisition, regardless of whether or not the receiving entity elects to restate prior periods. Therefore, the change in ownership interest resulting from the acquisition of non-controlling interest will be accounted for as an equity transaction at that acquisition date. If the receiving entity restates its consolidated financial statements to reflect the comparative information of the entity transferred for the period before the business combination under common control, it will include the non–controlling interest in transferred entity within equity until the actual date of the transaction.

Illustrative example – Application of pooling of interests method

Company A has two 100% subsidiaries – Company X and Company Y. On 1 January 2022 Company A sells Company X to Company Y for 4500 KEUR.
No intra-group transactions have taken place between Companies X and Y.
In the consolidated financial statements of Company A the following balances are related to Company X as at 31.12.2021:

  • Goodwill from the acquisition of Company X is carried at 500 KEUR
  • PPE fair value adjustment at cost of 1000 EUR is carried at 600 KEUR and amortised over 5 years

Group structures before and after the reorganisation are as follows:

Before

Company structure before the transaction

After

Company structure after the transaction

Statements of financial position of Company X and Company Y before and after the business combination under common control:

Company Y
SOFP31.12.202131.12.2022
Current assets4 0005 700
Non-current assets3 5006 600
incl Investment in subsidiary04 500
Total Assets7 50012 300
 
Current liabilities1 0001 300
Non-current liabilities2 5004 500
Total Liabilities3 5005 800
 
Share capital1 0001 000
Reserves100100
Retained earnings2 9005 400
Total Equity4 0006 500
Total Liabilities and Equity7 50012 300
 
SOCI20212022
Revenue25 00030 000
Operating expenses-22 000-26 000
Operating profit3 0004 000
 
Finance income/-expenses-1 000-1 500
Profit for the year2 0002 500
Company X
SOFP31.12.202131.12.2022
Current assets4 0005 000
Non-current assets1 2002 000
 
Total Assets5 2007 000
 
Current liabilities1 2001 400
Non-current liabilities1 0001 100
Total Liabilities2 2002 500
 
Share capital1 0001 000
Reserves100100
Retained earnings1 9003 400
Total Equity3 0004 500
Total Liabilities and Equity5 2007 000
 
SOCI20212022
Revenue20 00021 000
Operating expenses-18 000-18 500
Operating profit2 0002 500
 
Finance income/-expenses-900-1 000
Profit for the year1 1001 500

Company Y has made the following accounting policy choices:

  • Carrying amounts of assets and liabilities as reported in the consolidated financial statements of Company A are used
  • Periods prior to the business combination under common control are not restated
  • Equity balances of Company X are not carried over

Consolidated SOFP at the date of business combination is as follows:

Company YCompany XAdjustmentsConsolidated 01.01.2022
Current assets4 0004 0008 000
Non-current assets3 5001 2006005 300
incl: Investment in subsidiary4 500-4 5000
Goodwill500500
Total Assets7 5005 200-3 4009 300
 
Current liabilities1 0001 2002 200
Non-current liabilities2 5001 0003 500
Total Liabilities3 5002 20005 700
 
Share capital1 0001 000-1 0001 000
Reserves100100-100100
Retained earnings2 9001 900-2 3002 500
Total Equity4 0003 000-3 4003 600
Total Liabilities and Equity7 5005 200-3 4009 300

Calculation of the effect of the business combination under common control:

Consideration transferred4 500
Company X net assets at date of acquisition3 000
Previously accounted:
Goodwill related to Company X500
PPE fair value adjustment related to Company X600
Difference between the consideration transferred and net assets acquired400Decrease in equity
 
Accounting entries:
CR Cash4 500
DR Net assets, incl goodwill4 100
DR Retained earnings400

Adjustments reflected in equity in SOFP as at acquisition date equal to the elimination of net assets of Company X and decrease from the difference between the consideration transferred and the net assets acquired (-3000 – 400 = -3400).

Consolidated SOFP and SOCE as at 31.12.2022 and SOCI for the year then ended are as follows:

Consolidated SOFP as at 31.12.2022
Company YCompany XAdjustmentsConsolidated 31.12.2022
Current assets5 7005 00010 700
Non-current assets6 6002 0004009 000
incl: Investment in subsidiary4 500-4 5000
Goodwill500500
Total Assets12 3007 000-3 60015 700
 
Current liabilities1 3001 4002 700
Non-current liabilities4 5001 1005 600
Total Liabilities5 8002 50008 300
 
Share capital1 0001 000-1 0001 000
Reserves100100-100100
Retained earnings5 4003 400-2 5006 300
Total Equity6 5004 500-3 6007 400
Total Liabilities and Equity12 3007 000-3 60015 700

Adjustments in equity contain amounts carried forward from the date of acquisition and additional annual depreciation of PPE = -3400 – 200 = -3600.

Consolidated SOCI for the year ended 31.12.2022
Company YCompany XAdjustmentsConsolidated 2022
Revenue30 00021 00051 000
Operating expenses-26 000-18 500-200-44 700
Operating profit4 0002 500-2006 300
 
Finance income/-expenses-1 500-1 000-2 500
Profit for the year2 5001 500-2003 800
Consolidated SOCE as at 31.12.2022
Share capitalReservesRetained earningsTotal
As at 31.12.20211 0001002 9004 000
Business combinations under common control00-400-400
Profit for the year003 8003 800
As at 31.12.20221 0001006 3007 400

Considerations under the US GAAP

Under the US GAAP the accounting and reporting requirements for transactions between entities under common control is addressed in the subsections of ASC 805-50.

The main differences with IFRS are:

  • Only the book-value method (pooling of interest method under IFRS) is acceptable in accounting for the business combinations under common control
  • The assets and liabilities transferred shall be measured by the receiving entity at the carrying amounts recognised by the controlling entity in the consolidated financial statements
  • Financial information of prior periods shall be restated in the consolidated financial statements of the receiving entity.

Rephop helps you record all the information required for business combination under common control and automatically uses this information in the consolidation process, whether you are adhering to IFRS or US GAAP. With our software, you can ensure that your consolidated financial statements are accurate and comply with both IFRS and US GAAP reporting requirements, all while saving time and reducing manual effort.